{"id":488514,"date":"2024-11-05T12:19:53","date_gmt":"2024-11-05T12:19:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/uncategorized\/api-rp-581-2016\/"},"modified":"2024-11-05T12:19:53","modified_gmt":"2024-11-05T12:19:53","slug":"api-rp-581-2016","status":"publish","type":"product","link":"https:\/\/pdfstandards.shop\/product\/publishers\/api\/api-rp-581-2016\/","title":{"rendered":"API RP 581-2016"},"content":{"rendered":"

1 Scope<\/p>\n

1.1 Purpose<\/p>\n

This recommended practice, API 581, Risk-Based Inspection Methodology, provides quantitative procedures to establish an inspection program using risk-based methods for pressurized fixed equipment including pressure vessel, piping, tankage, pressure-relief devices (PRDs), and heat exchanger tube bundles. API 580, Risk-Based Inspection provides guidance for developing risk-based inspection (RBI) programs on fixed equipment in refining, petrochemical, chemical process plants, and oil and gas production facilities. The intent is for API 580 to introduce the principles and present minimum general guidelines for RBI, while this recommended practice provides quantitative calculation methods to determine an inspection plan.<\/p>\n

1.2 Introduction<\/p>\n

The calculation of risk outlined in API 581 involves the determination of a probability of failure (POF) combined with the consequence of failure (COF). Failure is defined as a loss of containment from the pressure boundary resulting in leakage to the atmosphere or rupture of a pressurized component. Risk increases as damage accumulates during in-service operation as the risk tolerance or risk target is approached and an inspection is recommended of sufficient effectiveness to better quantify the damage state of the component. The inspection action itself does not reduce the risk; however, it does reduce uncertainty and therefore allows more accurate quantification of the damage present in the component.<\/p>\n

1.3 Risk Management<\/p>\n

In most situations, once risks have been identified, alternate opportunities are available to reduce them. However, nearly all major commercial losses are the result of a failure to understand or manage risk. In the past, the focus of a risk assessment has been on-site safety-related issues. Presently, there is an increased awareness of the need to assess risk resulting from:<\/p>\n